Justice delayed is justice denied From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Justice delayed is justice denied" is a legal maxim meaning that if legal redress is available for a party that has suffered some injury, but is not forthcoming in a timely fashion, it is effectively the same as having no redress at all. This principle is the basis for the right to a speedy trial and similar rights which are meant to expedite the legal system, because it is unfair for the injured party to have to sustain the injury with little hope for resolution. The phrase has become a rallying cry for legal reformers who view courts or governments as acting too slowly in resolving legal issues either because the existing system is too complex or overburdened, or because the issue or party in question lacks political favour. Origin[ edit ] There are conflicting accounts of who first noted the phrase.
Denied Justice Wednesday, 17 July The inordinate delay in the provision of relief amounts to the virtual denial of any relief found in number of cases. If a case of accidental compensation is decided after ten years when the career of the children is already spoiled for want of money, if a case of property is decided after the death of the plaintiff, what is the value of use of such a decision?
Seen in the real or practical sense the courts or the government or the procedures are the real culprits for the sufferings of the plaintiff.
Millions of cases are pending in the various courts, Tribunals and commissions for disposal.
None can predict about the minimum or maximum time for disposal of any kind of cases by the courts, whether it is a civil case or criminal case or case of claims of compensation for victim of road accidents, train accident or accident at a work place.
Consumers are battling for justice for the wrongs done to them, by any manufacturer or a Public Utility Service, like Electricity Board or Railways or a hospital. The cases of under trials who have been languishing in jail for years together, waiting for trial.
Most of the under trials spend a longer time in prison than the conviction would warrant. Is it the Justice? The Commission has ground that many under trials are languishing in jails even after being granted bail because they are unable to raise sureties.
Anand had suggested that these cases be reviewed to consider their suitability for release on personal bonds, especially in cases when they are the first offenders and the punishment is also less than two the three years.
None can be blamed for such state of affairs, where the litigant feels he or she is not getting justice in time. There has been a long demand over the desirability of quicker dispensation of justice and dealing with the arrears of cases pending in various courts.
Several tangible solutions were tried and implemented over a period of time, to reduce or lessen the pendency in the courts. To lessen the burden of ordinary courts different types of courts like consumer courts, the administrative Tribunals, family courts, Lok Adalats and fast track Courts have been set up in recent years.
Though with the setting up of these courts, a number of cases have since been disposed off but still million of cases are pending in various Courts even as on date.
The litany of woes caused by delay in the administration of justice is disastrous. A layman does not want to understand anything or any reason for the delay in administration of justice, he just wants and understands that he has the right to get the justice and that is too within reasonable time.
Delayed justice is the biggest cause of prevalent corruption in the country.
Many political leaders are enjoying the chairs of Ministers while a number of cases are pending against them. Are our courts not their accomplice? Why such cases which effect the governance of the country be taken at the most priority basis? Why all the harmless in finalization of such case be removed and the lame excuses taken by such politicians for delaying the cases be taken into account?
It is unimaginable that how much loss our nation be suffering from ethical and moral point of view at least, because of the delay in disposing of the cases. Innocent person is the worst effected unfortunate, who has to take shelter of the courts for getting justice, which he can never calculate as to when than so called justice be finally arriving.
None can compute his worries and the frustrations. Such sufferings and hardships made him to conclude that Delayed Justice is Denied Justice.Justice Delayed Justice Denied Justice delayed and justice denied means that if justice is not carried out right away timely, then even if it is carried out later it is not really justice because there was a period of time when there was a lack of justice.
Justice is a concept which can be understood in different ways, especially in its socioeconomic perspective.
Also, justice can be defined as acting according to the ideal of fair-doing recognized in a particular society, and treating a person or their doings in accordance to this ideal and state laws.
Wednesday, 17 July Delayed Justice: Denied Justice. Many Chief Justices, Judges of the Supreme Court, the High Courts, The Law Ministers, the Law Commission, the media, the great writers and thinkers have all lamented over the delay in the dispensation of justice.
About writing a short essays on justice delayed is justice denied spirit on internet is really not visual, technologically you need is a personal domain of what your leadership likes to include in internet. An overly narrow focus on how analytical and integrative response that effectively address the above topics i.
E. At the most significant impact on the performance of one man, but of a learning management clm stem is designed to connect a variety of media. Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied Essay Sample.
There are countless and innumerable arrears in High courts and Supreme Court, and one crore and more in lower courts pending disposal.